search

Fantasy Projection

Description: Confusing subjective experiences, usually very emotionally charged, with objective reality, then suggesting or demanding that others accept the subjective experience as objective reality.

New Terminology: In this context, subjective experience is the way one interprets some external stimuli. Objective reality is independent of our interpretations; it is a collection of facts about the world we all share.

Logical Form:

Person 1 has subjective experience X.
Person 1 incorrectly believes that experience X represents objective reality.
Therefore, person 1 insists that others accept that X represents objective reality.

Example #1:

Freddie: People are mean to me wherever I go. It is clear that we live in a cruel world with people who are mostly nasty. If you don’t see that, something is wrong with you!

Explanation: Perhaps people are mean to Freddie because Freddie is mean to others, and it’s Freddie’s behavior that is resulting in the “mean” behaviors of others (this is known as a self-fulfilling prophecy). Freddie is projecting his experience, which is unique to him, onto the world at large. He is insisting that other people see humanity the way he does. We don’t deny that Freddie is experiencing the world in the way he is; we just don’t accept that Freddie’s experience represents objective reality. To accurately determine if the world is, indeed, made up of “people who are mostly nasty,” we would need to conduct research using the scientific method.

Example #2:

I feel that we are all surrounded by Narggles. These are spiritual beings who help us through life. We know they exist because they are the ones that give us the confidence to move forward in a decision.

Explanation: Ignoring the circular reasoning (how we "know" Narggles exist), one person's fantasy might be their own reality, but not everyone else's.

Exception: One can argue that one's subjective experience is part of objective reality as long as they don’t insist that you interpret the stimuli the same way they did.

Freddie: It is a fact that this world consists of people who feel like most people they interact with are mean to them.

Fun Fact: Everyone knows Kerplunkers, not Narggles, are spiritual beings who help us through life.

References:

This a logical fallacy frequently used on the Internet. No academic sources could be found.

Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book