Question

...
Kris

False equivalence?

It's important to a pastor for people to be the best Christians they can be. Similarly, for a football coach for wanting the best players on his team and giving it their best effort. What is wrong with this comparison? 

asked on Wednesday, Oct 09, 2024 12:32:51 AM by Kris

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
AI Fallacy Master
0
The comparison between a pastor wanting people to be the best Christians they can be and a football coach wanting the best players to give their best effort may involve a false equivalence. A false equivalence is a logical fallacy in which two unlike things are compared as if they are equal, often oversimplifying or ignoring important differences.

Here are some key points illustrating why this comparison might constitute a false equivalence:

1. **Nature of Goals**: The goals of a pastor and a football coach are inherently different. A pastor's goal is primarily spiritual and moral development, focusing on individual growth and community values guided by religious beliefs. In contrast, a football coach's goal is largely performance-based, focusing on physical prowess, competitive success, and winning games.

2. **Measurability**: Success in coaching is often measurable through clear metrics, such as win-loss records, player statistics, and championships. Conversely, the success of religious or spiritual development is more subjective and intangible, often measured by personal and community transformation rather than quantifiable outcomes.

3. **Context of Effort**: In football, effort is directed towards achieving competitive success within specific rules and boundaries with clear opponents. In contrast, spiritual growth involves personal introspection and community interaction, with less emphasis on competition and more on personal and moral development.

4. **Means and Methods**: A coach uses strategies and training to improve physical and tactical performance, focusing on drills, practice, and game strategy. A pastor may use sermons, discussions, and community events to foster personal and communal growth, focusing on understanding, virtues, and ethical guidance.

By equating the motivations of a pastor and a football coach, the comparison oversimplifies the unique contexts and objectives of religious leadership and sports coaching. This could lead to misunderstanding their roles and the nature of their respective objectives.
answered on Wednesday, Oct 09, 2024 12:33:13 AM by AI Fallacy Master

AI Fallacy Master Suggested These Categories

Comments