|
|
Fallacy or not?Daniel: God exists Sam: Prove it Daniel: Can a copy create itself? Sam: No. Daniel: How can nature create itself? Daniel: natural things cant move beacause they need some agency to move therefore, god exists
|
| asked on Monday, Jun 28, 2021 10:55:34 PM by Fearnone | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Dr. Bo is creating online courses in the area of critical thinking, reason, science, psychology, philosophy, and well-being. These courses are self-paced and presented in small, easy-to-digest nuggets of information. Use the code FALLACYFRIENDS to get 25% off any or all of Dr. Bo's courses.
|
|
non sequitur since nature 'requiring agency' does not necessarily imply that 'God' is behind that agency. This would need to be established a posteriori with independent evidence. |
| answered on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2021 02:40:25 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
Daniel is attempting to divert the focus of the discussion He presented the proposition, therefore, he bears the burden of proof --- not anyone else. Fallacy of Diversion in action. Fallacy of diversion is when you have no answer to the topic at hand, you divert the discussion to something more comfortable. |
| answered on Tuesday, Jun 29, 2021 01:50:24 PM by Dr. Richard | |
Dr. Richard Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
