|
|
Does this fallacy exist?I tried searching Current Year fallacy but couldnt find anything. The current year is an argument I see a lot and suspected it that it was a fallacy. For example: It's the current year, why doesnt everyone have X
"It's the 2018 why doesnt everyone have a smart phone?" Does this fallacy exist? |
| asked on Friday, Apr 13, 2018 03:41:29 PM by | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
It would fall under a non sequiter , assuming that the year has nothing/little to do with X.
|
| answered on Friday, Apr 13, 2018 03:43:47 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
(re-posting this after registration, so others get to see the answer, too)
Actually, behind this is a valid logical conclusion with the expected result. My understanding of the underlying statement is as follows: (1) in the year 2018, everybody has a smartphone. (2) it is the year 2018. (3) everybody has a smartphone. So far this a "textbook example" of the 'modus ponens', one of the most elementary logic figures. Except that we have already established that (3) is false . This means in turn that at least one of (1) or (2) must be false , too – either it is not the year 2018, or there isn't really a rule that says that everybody in 2018 must have a smartphone. Since I can verify the current year by quickly glancing at my wall calendar, I have to assume that it's actually premise (1) that is false . I hope that explains. No (logical) fallacy here, just a wrong presumption (is there a named fallacy for that?) @AdHominemInfo |
| answered on Tuesday, Apr 17, 2018 07:43:34 AM by Ad Hominem Info |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
Chronological snobbery
|
| answered on Wednesday, Apr 18, 2018 12:36:23 AM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|
| |
