|
|
What is this fallacy that person 2 madePerson 1: heroin is highly addictive therefore its bad for people Person 2: heroin isn't addictive because addiction was around before heroin |
| asked on Friday, Sep 30, 2022 07:14:17 PM by Whimsicott | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are. The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning. With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
Ad hoc Rescue or an MSU ( making shit up) non-sequitur. The history of addiction has nothing to do with the physically addictive properties of Heroin. |
| answered on Friday, Sep 30, 2022 07:45:57 PM by Mchasewalker | |
Mchasewalker Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
When a result can happen due to multiple causes but we miss some of them, our conclusion will be false and that would be a case of affirming the consequent . We know that |
| answered on Saturday, Oct 01, 2022 08:57:15 AM by Kostas Oikonomou | |
Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
"The existence of a kind of thing does not allow the existence of new things of the same kind." That's a made-up rule. This would be wishful thinking |
| answered on Saturday, Oct 01, 2022 12:08:28 PM by Jorge | |
Jorge Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
