What's wrong with this logic?

THE AVERAGE MAN TODAY.

 

1. No masculinity. 

 

2. No skills.

 

3. No confidence.

 

4. No financial literacy

 

5. No discpline.

 

6. No purpose.

 

7. No emotional intelligence.

 

8. No meaningful pursuit. 

 

9. No workout, unhealthy.

 

10. No spirituality.

 

If you have these qualities in you just know that you are an average man, change or perish. 

 

Be wise. 

🙏

Class dismissed 🥂

The logic in this argument is flawed for several reasons. Below, I'll address various logical fallacies, cognitive biases, poor logic, and poor reasoning present in the text:

### Logical Fallacies:

1. **Hasty Generalization**:
- The statement assumes that the "average man today" universally lacks the listed attributes without providing any evidence or recognizing individual differences. This is an overgeneralization.

2. **False Dilemma (Black-and-White Thinking)**:
- The argument suggests that the only options are to "change or perish," ignoring the nuance that people can possess various combinations of qualities and still lead successful or meaningful lives.

3. **Ad Hominem**:
- The assertion implicitly attacks a broad group of people (average men) by labeling them with negative attributes, rather than addressing any specific behavior or proposing constructive solutions.

4. **Appeal to Fear**:
- The phrase "change or perish" is designed to invoke fear rather than rational thought, pushing the reader toward a particular action based on a threat of negative consequences.

### Cognitive Biases:

1. **Confirmation Bias**:
- The argument might appeal to those who already hold negative views about modern men and serve to reinforce those biases without presenting balanced or evidence-based perspectives.

2. **Stereotyping**:
- The statement relies on stereotypical notions of masculinity and other attributes, boiling down complex human qualities into a simplistic and biased framework.

### Poor Logic and Reasoning:

1. **Lack of Empirical Evidence**:
- The assertions are presented without any data, studies, or factual evidence to support the claims. This reduces the argument to mere opinion rather than a well-reasoned viewpoint.

2. **Oversimplification**:
- Human characteristics and societal roles are complex and multifaceted. Reducing them to a checklist oversimplifies the human experience and overlooks the diversity of ways in which people can find purpose, develop skills, and lead meaningful lives.

3. **Inconsistency**:
- The text associates masculinity with numerous positive attributes (skills, confidence, financial literacy, etc.), yet fails to define or justify why these specific traits are inherently linked to masculinity or what defines an "average man."

4. **Emotional Manipulation**:
- The use of phrases like "Be wise" and "Class dismissed" attempts to add authority and finality to the argument, which can manipulate readers into accepting the statements without critical analysis.

### Conclusion:

The argument is riddled with logical fallacies, cognitive biases, and deficient logic, making it unconvincing and unfairly judgmental. It fails to provide evidence-based claims, oversimplifies complex issues, and uses fear and stereotypes to persuade rather than rational argumentation.