|
|
Münchhausen trilemmaI saw this www.logicallyfallacious.c. . . but there is no mention of the Münchhausen trilemma anywhere on this site from what I can tell. Any thoughts on this as it relates to finding valid conclusions to any premise?
Thanks |
| asked on Tuesday, Dec 27, 2016 08:01:14 PM by Emick | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Dr. Bo is creating online courses in the area of critical thinking, reason, science, psychology, philosophy, and well-being. These courses are self-paced and presented in small, easy-to-digest nuggets of information. Use the code FALLACYFRIENDS to get 25% off any or all of Dr. Bo's courses.
|
|
Only to say that it is probably not mentioned because:
Nobody knows; Everybody knows, but nobody is telling; or Because it is ubiquitous and has therefore never become a question. (Is that what you mean?) |
| answered on Wednesday, Dec 28, 2016 03:17:53 AM by David Youngdahl |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
I consider the Münchhausen trilemma an extreme example of an 'argument from ignorance.'
|
| answered on Wednesday, Dec 28, 2016 08:21:49 AM by Frank |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
Theory of knowledge doesnt really coincide with logical proofs. It's more a matter of what's more logical or most logical than whether the logic has valid knowledge i thought.
|
| answered on Thursday, Dec 29, 2016 10:56:04 PM by skips777 |
Comments |
|
| |
