Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
No. There is no argument here. It is a statement of faith (claim). We could say that there is an implied argument: 1) A teacher is always quiet during a test. Form wise, this is fine. If we evaluate the reasonableness, we can see several issues: First, a teacher is not always quiet during a test. In fact, many teachers answer questions and provide demonstrable assistance to the student. This would make the conclusion unsound. Second, this is based on a self-sealing argument : if one feels that God is helping during a "test," then this is evidence that he exists. If one feels God is not there during a test, then he is like a teacher who doesn't help — and this is not evidence against his existence. Another problem with this line of reasoning is inconsistency. When God helps sometimes and other times not, the "God acts in mysterious ways" wildcard is played, which can be used to excuse everything and explain nothing at the same time. This reminds me of the claim that elephants hide in trees. When the skeptic mentions that nobody has ever seen this before, the retort is "that is because they are extremely good at it!" |
answered on Sunday, Jul 25, 2021 01:31:52 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|