|
|
is there a fallacy here?P1: more and more teenagers are playing violent games P2: video games themselves have become more graphically and realistically violent P3: the number and variety of video games have expanded dramatically C: school violence is mainly caused by teenagers playing violent video games |
|||
| asked on Thursday, Sep 30, 2021 09:56:45 AM by Shawn | ||||
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
||||
Comments |
||||
| ||||
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
|
Totally invalid conclusion. |
| answered on Thursday, Sep 30, 2021 05:56:08 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
Yep! As Shawn says, this claim confuses correlation (things happening at the same time) with causation. It's a common point of confusion, but things happening together doesn't mean they cause each other. It seems like the questionable cause fallacy. I've also heard it referred to as cum hoc ergo propter hoc ... for the latin scholars among us. Depending on how this approach is used, it can lead to lying with statistics if one presents a high correlation as evidence of causation. |
| answered on Friday, Oct 01, 2021 12:42:47 PM by Arlo | |
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |