|
|
Bait and SwitchRecently I had someone bring me in on a conversation with one topic but then switched topics, not because I "won" the original argument but because it was their plan all along just to get me to sit down and have a conversation. I doesn't seem like "Hypnotic Bait and Switch" or even a "Red Herring" which seems like a technique people use to divert an argument because they feel they are "losing."
To sum up, what is the fallacy when someone plans to purposefully entice you into a conversation about one thing your interested in but then switches the subject to something you would not want to talk about. |
| asked on Friday, Oct 12, 2018 07:23:16 PM by Jonathan Thomas | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
I wouldn't call this a fallacy (because there is no error in reasoning on the part of either party). This is either a deliberate attempt to mislead someone or simply the failure to remain on topic.
|
| answered on Saturday, Oct 13, 2018 09:30:05 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|
| |
