Question

...
Claudio

Is it a fallacy?

I browsed the catalogue and could identify some similarities with some logical fallacies, but I wonder if there is a stronger definition:

Example:

Person A: I can touch liquid lava fresh off the volcano without wearing any protective equipment.

Person B: Are you saying that fresh lava off the volcano is not hot?

Person A: Makes a funny comment comparing the question with Cathy Newman's "are you saying?"

Although Person A is not explicitly saying that liquid lava fresh off the volcano is not hot, the fact that he/she can touch it without wearing any protective equipment, considering that no super powers are involved, implies that fresh lava off the volcano is not hot.

asked on Thursday, Apr 29, 2021 08:19:35 PM by Claudio

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments
...
2
Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

I am sorry,  I don't get any of this. Person A appears to be setting person B up for a brain-teaser. I have no idea with Cathy Newman is.

the fact that he/she can touch it without wearing any protective equipment, considering that no super powers are involved, implies that fresh lava off the volcano is not hot.

I wouldn't say it does imply this. Again, to me, it appears to be a cleaver brain-teaser or just some trick, like person A can "touch" with a stick or something. I see no fallacies here.

posted on Friday, Apr 30, 2021 07:34:06 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
DAVIDMITZVA
0

The statement does not violate any logical sequence. The lava is assumed to have cooled enough for one to touch it. Therefore there is no fallacy.

answered on Thursday, May 06, 2021 05:28:18 PM by DAVIDMITZVA

DAVIDMITZVA Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Kuda
0

I take it that A's response to B about the Newman comparison is the same as telling him that B committed a straw man fallacy because A never said such a thing (that A is mentally unsound or that he simply wants to show B a point are also possibilities). The point here is whether B is committing such a fallacy and I would say no because A never said an argument, to begin with. If B is guilty of anything it is simply not asking the right question (like "What do you mean by that?").

answered on Friday, May 07, 2021 12:29:49 PM by Kuda

Kuda Suggested These Categories

Comments