|
|
Is this An example of Kettle Logic?A. Astrology is backed up by science B. Absolutely not go to any university and look for the Astrology department.
B. Science is based on any new observation of evidence A. Yes but everything is relative is it not? B. If everything is relative then the statement everything is relative…..isn’t relative. First it’s science backs up claim then it’s actually science is unreliable then it’s Solphism. |
| asked on Thursday, May 12, 2022 04:42:49 PM by alex | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
The first argument is incomplete. "Science has been wrong before..." therefore....? What is person A's point? If they're trying to say astrology is 'backed up by science' (implying it is real), then saying that science has been wrong before, this is close to conflicting conditions because they're suggesting we should trust astrology because it is scientific, then saying science has been wrong before, as if we shouldn't trust the science behind astrology. Besides that, 'science has been wrong before' pretty much demonstrates nothing - after all, the point of science is to self-correct, not be some sort of all-knowing entity. In the second argument, "everything is relative" is...an incomplete comment. Everything is relative, therefore...? Once again, we have to fill in the blanks. The statement 'everything is relative' can be argued to be conflicting conditions. In short, because the arguments are not complete, I'm struggling to get a read on what's being said...but those are my thoughts. |
| answered on Friday, May 13, 2022 03:55:21 AM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
Moving the goalposts? |
| answered on Friday, May 13, 2022 07:42:35 AM by skips777 | |
skips777 Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
