Question

...
Nathan Slash

Non Sequitur?

Eat more chocolate cakes so you'll end up baking them perfectly without practicing. 

asked on Monday, Jun 28, 2021 08:46:52 AM by Nathan Slash

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
3

That's not an argument; it is a claim that follows the IF then THAT format. We can either say the claim is true, false, or somewhere in between (based on circumstances).

answered on Monday, Jun 28, 2021 10:31:08 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments