|
|
gun control/mass shootingsIs there a fallacy in this. “There were no mass shootings when gun control was next to nonexistent. Now that there is gun control mass shooting happen all the time. Therefore gun control causes mass shootings”
|
| asked on Thursday, Nov 29, 2018 11:18:38 AM by Geoff zinkan | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
This book is a crash course, meant to catapult you into a world where you start to see things how they really are, not how you think they are. The focus of this book is on logical fallacies, which loosely defined, are simply errors in reasoning. With the reading of each page, you can make significant improvements in the way you reason and make decisions.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
There could be a false cause (also known as questionable cause, confusing correlation and causation) fallacy there, since the correlation between gun control and mass shootings is asserted as a causation. If the arguer goes on to logically justify or provide evidence for the causal link between gun control and mass shootings, his argument won't be fallacious anymore.
The Questionable Cause Fallacy: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/148/Questionable-Cause<> |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 29, 2018 11:28:33 AM by Abdulazeez |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
Good one, Geoff, One of my favorite fallacies:
Post Hoc ergo propter hoc The Latin phrase “post hoc ergo propter hoc” means, literally, “after this therefore because of this.” The post hoc fallacy is committed when it is assumed that because one thing occurred after another, it must have occurred as a result of it. Mere temporal succession, however, does not entail causal succession. |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 29, 2018 11:57:51 AM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|
| |
