|
|
What Fallacy is thisPerson A commits an indiscretion. When called on the indiscretion, person A excuses his action because person B did the same.
|
| asked on Tuesday, Jul 28, 2020 12:52:37 PM by Senior Master Sergeant | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
|
Sounds like the Ad Hominem (Tu quoque) . |
| answered on Tuesday, Jul 28, 2020 12:59:01 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
|
|
Logical form: Person A did X. X is considered wrong. X is not wrong in this case because person B also did X. If something is wrong, then it's...wrong. Another person doing it does not alter the nature of the action itself; it simply means that two people have now committed wrong. So if it was wrong when person B did it, it is wrong when person A does it too. This is the logical fallacy of Ad Hominem (Tu quoque); a common fallacy of relevance used to change the conversation from one's wrongdoing to another's wrongdoing. |
| answered on Tuesday, Jul 28, 2020 05:01:03 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
