What's it call when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of and then recommend a "virtuous" course of action?

Examples:

Biblical times:

The crops have failed. Clearly God is displeased by your lack of humility. Sacrifice your cattle to him to show you are sorry.

Modern times:

Doctor: Not sure what's wrong with you but I suspect its because you're overweight. Start on this new diet and exercise regime and call me when you've lost 20lbs.

asked on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 11:53:03 AM by Katherine

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Bo Bennett, PhD writes:

In addition to my answer below, I just wanted to comment that your modern times example is far less problematic than your Biblical times one. In your modern times example, the doctor could be giving their expert opinion. They stated as much by admitting uncertainty in the diagnoses. Being overweight is a common comorbidity so this is not unreasonable. Had the doctor said, "but I suspect you are not right with God," then that would be a very different story.

posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:18:11 PM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.

Take the Online Course

Answers

Bo Bennett, PhD

I would say

1) Claiming a cause when the cause is unknown is Argument from Ignorance and Jumping to Conclusions .

2) then blaming on things one disapproves of is a form of Shoehorning

3) then recommend a "virtuous" course of action is just an opinion.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:09:39 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

0	Katherine writes: Thank you. I appreciate your time. :-)
	posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 12:42:31 PM

mchasewalker

What's it call (sic) when people blame things (on things) they don't understand...?

Promiscuous teleology, or, hyper active agency detection.

What's it call (sic) when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of...?

Superstition, selective moral superiority, or religious judgmentalism.

What's it call (sic) when people blame things they don't understand on things they don't approve of and then recommend a "virtuous" course of action?

Theodicy.

answered on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 03:47:39 PM by mchasewalker

mchasewalker Suggested These Categories

Comments

1	Mr Z writes: Regarding the third item. Theodicy is typically defined as an answer to why an O-3 God would allow evil - either moral evil or seemingly meaningless physical suffering. Perhaps ignorant prejudice?
	posted on Wednesday, Jul 29, 2020 09:51:32 PM

0	mchasewalker writes: I was being flippant, but perhaps theology would be a funnier reply?
	posted on Thursday, Jul 30, 2020 05:00:40 PM