Question

...
Jason Mathias

Can subjectivity make a fallacy not a fallacy?

Professional artist A creates paintings. 

Person 1: Artist A's artwork is bad because he is a Biden supporter. 

Now, I know this is usually a non sequitur fallacy because the two things are completely unrelated. But, since artwork being good or bad is subjective does that change things? Say person 1 has negative feelings about Biden, and so when he looks at the artwork of a Biden supporter he gets negative feelings and it makes the artwork look bad to him. Or, maybe he is just lying for political reasons. How would we then tell if its a logical fallacy or not? 

asked on Monday, Dec 06, 2021 04:09:24 PM by Jason Mathias

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
2

This reminds me of the post a few weeks about not finding a trans woman attractive only after one realizes she is trans. Art is subjective, and it is possible that knowing unfavorable things about the artist can sway one's opinion. Another example, I honestly am not attracted to beautiful women with lousy personalities. I would say, "She is not attractive because she is a horrible human being." The clear implication, because we are dealing with an obviously subjective term, is that she is not attractive to me.

Regardless, we are not talking about an argument here; we are talking about an opinion (i.e., an expression of one's personal preferences), so no fallacy. This is unlike saying Artist A's claim that vaccines are safe and effective is wrong because he's a Biden supporter . The truth of the claim is objective, or independent of the mind - not an opinion.

Preferences are largely arational; that is, we can't find a rational basis for having them nor can we find them irrational. If you think the art sucks because it was painted by a Biden supporter, then so be it.

answered on Monday, Dec 06, 2021 05:20:33 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
0
TrappedPrior (RotE) writes:

Yeah. I mean you  could  say, "well, that's not really dealing with the physical qualities of the art, is it?" but since it's an opinion (even if one thinks it's stupid), it's not fallacious.

posted on Monday, Dec 06, 2021 08:00:14 PM