Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
Q1: You are referring to the argument of the beard . The example you present, however, is of a different structure so not fallacious (at least not in the same way). Your example is more an issue with simply being wrong about the law. Q2: No fallacy, that is not an argument. You could reword it to make an appeal to popularity , if the claim is that it would be the right thing to do. |
answered on Monday, Jan 18, 2021 08:51:23 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Since the proposal of 1 day short easily converts to only 1 day short of 1 day short, I believe the fallacy becomes one of slippery slope . Usually, the context is the basis of a warning, but here it's behind the claim. I don't see a fallacy in the second statement. It's part of an admonishment not to follow the friends in error |
answered on Sunday, Jan 17, 2021 08:54:11 AM by DrBill | |
DrBill Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|