Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The fallacy of equivocation is the fallacy of switching between 2 definitions of a word. |
answered on Thursday, Nov 10, 2022 04:09:20 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | |
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
Polysemous words and homographs constitute a known problem for both language learners and rational discourse. In the case of what I would assign as the relevant fallacy here (equivocation), what makes a term “ambiguous” does not define the fallacy but the “usage of ambiguity” itself. As such, a fallacy of equivocation occurs when a key term or phrase in an argument is used in an ambiguous way with misleading results. |
answered on Friday, Nov 11, 2022 06:51:32 AM by Anthony | |
Anthony Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|