Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
The argument is fine if it is in response to the claim that "guns kill people." This is a lazy soundbite for a much more elaborate argument. The argument is something along the lines of the prevalence of guns is unequivocally correlated with the level of gun violence. Therefore, reduce the number of guns available and reduce the gun violence. IF this is in response to that THAT argument, it would be a classic strawman fallacy . I do want to stress that if people insist on the simplistic "guns kill people" claim, they are opening themselves up to this kind of response. Perhaps, this can also be logic chopping in that it is generally clear what people mean when they say "guns kill people." It is understood that guns don't possess agency and it is the agent behind the gun that does the killing. The argument against this is that there are probably too many people who don't know the real argument and are just repeating what they have been told. |
| answered on Saturday, Apr 08, 2023 03:09:47 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |