Question

...
Citizen Irrelevant

Putin’s Analogy : Is this a fallacy?

 

From a recent article:


“ President Vladimir Putin insisted Russia's homegrown coronavirus vaccine was as “reliable as a Kalashnikov assault rifle”…

Leave it to a rabid strongman to draw such an absurd analogy, but I was wondering if this might entail a fallacy?  Vaccine = Kalashnikov?  ( False analogy? )

 

asked on Friday, May 07, 2021 05:06:13 PM by Citizen Irrelevant

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments
...
1
account no longer exists writes:

It’s a simile in the service of an analogy, so more a rhetorical device than a logical fallacy, true if the reliability of the Sputnik vaccine is comparable to the legendary reliability of the Kalishnikov, which seems difficult to quantify. I’m not sure the vaccine would work as well as a Kalishnikov would if both were used in battlefield conditions for a month. As a simile it’s also a metaphor; as such a “shot” from either would not be mixed. Putinese hyperbole?

posted on Saturday, May 08, 2021 07:21:02 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
TrappedPrior (RotE)
3

I doubt Putin is making an argument. It's just a statement of opinion (and probably a way of hyping up his vaccine).

answered on Friday, May 07, 2021 05:40:05 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE)

TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
richard smith
0

Seems like more of an opinion. Red cars are better than blue cars. Red cars are has reliable has Roberts pluming. You can set your watch to .........

 

answered on Saturday, May 08, 2021 08:23:12 AM by richard smith

richard smith Suggested These Categories

Comments
...
Jordan Pine
0

It could be argued his statement is logically fallacious. The fallacy would be weak analogy. Vaccines have little in common with assault rifles.

Of course, President Putin is trying to be persuasive. That is, his rhetoric is less logos and more pathos. However, Scott Adams has argued that analogies are terrible for persuasion for just this reason: "Analogies are good tools for explaining a concept to someone for the first time," he writes. "But because analogies are imperfect they are the worst way to persuade. All discussions that involve analogies devolve into arguments about the quality of the analogy, not the underlying situation."

So it seems Putin fails here at both logic and persuasion.
answered on Saturday, May 08, 2021 11:01:42 AM by Jordan Pine

Jordan Pine Suggested These Categories

Comments