Question

...
Mr. Brinstar

Mocking the position

This is something I've come across many times, though I'm not sure it's a fallacy or just an unscrupulous debate tactic. I don't really think it's an appeal to ridicule, as that involves exaggerating an argument beyond reason.

Basically, instead of giving an counterargument or defense to a claim/argument, the opposition simply laughs at/mocks the arguer's position in order to diminish it's validity.

Some examples:

"You clearly don't clean around the house, seeing as I left this house for a week and came back to an absolute pigsty."

"Yeah sure, I never do anything at all, you're totally not whinging right now!"

 

"Your performance at work goes down when you drink. You've started drinking again, and immediately your performance started to suffer."

"Yeah of course it's the drinking, you're so right, aren't I just a slacker hahaha"

 

Similarly, I also recently saw some well-known internet personalities being accused of slacking off on work in order to further a business venture, and they replied, not with a defense/explanation, but by simply mocking their fans for noticing it at all.

 

 

Basically, the opponent is not giving a counterargument to the claim, he/she just derisively mocks the position, and by extension, the arguer. What would you say this is?

asked on Tuesday, Nov 02, 2021 05:46:11 PM by Mr. Brinstar

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

...
1
Shawn writes:

I don't know if it is a fallacy per se, but maybe a diversionary tactic or a way to diffuse the situation. The person may be saying something that is true and the responder simply does not want to deal with or have a confrontation. It could also be a subtle form of ad hominem where the person is made to look stupid, small or petty. It is a good observation on your part. 

posted on Wednesday, Nov 03, 2021 07:16:48 AM

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
TrappedPrior (RotE)
3

Not an argument. It's rhetoric; often sarcastic, but sometimes just directly insulting.

Now, if the second person insults the first person (and uses that to dismiss their claim), it is now fallacious (ad hominem (abusive)).

For instance:

Joan: I really think your performance at work is affected by the amount you drink.

Jasper: Well I think you're stupid, so it can't be anything to do with that.

This is a non-fallacious example, similar to the one you gave:

Joan: Honestly, you shouldn't drink so much; it's probably getting in the way of your work.

Jasper: Yeah, SURE. It couldn't be anything else, right?

answered on Wednesday, Nov 03, 2021 12:17:17 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE)

TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Kostas Oikonomou
-1

This is called "Passive Aggressive Behavior". 
Passive-aggressive behavior is a pattern of indirectly expressing negative feelings instead of openly addressing them.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/expert-answers/passive-aggressive-behavior/faq-20057901

Also,
"Passive-aggressive means that we don't say what we mean but rather we say something positive but we say it with an angry tone or angry feeling underneath."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nWSBZxRkA4

So, it's not an argument. It's indirectly expressing disapproval or dismissing of what the other person claims. Sarcasm, I guess, would be another name to describe it.  

answered on Wednesday, Nov 03, 2021 10:53:08 AM by Kostas Oikonomou

Kostas Oikonomou Suggested These Categories

Comments