Quickly register to comment, Ask questions, and/or keep up to date on new fallacies.

one moment please...

Affirming a Disjunct

  Get the Book!

Get the book, Logically Fallacious by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:

Get It!

(also known as: the fallacy of the alternative disjunct, false exclusionary disjunct, affirming one disjunct, the fallacy of the alternative syllogism, asserting an alternative, improper disjunctive syllogism, fallacy of the disjunctive syllogism)

New Terminology:

Disjunction: A proposition of the "either/or" form, which is true if one or both of its propositional components is true; otherwise, it is false.

Disjunct: One of the propositional components of a disjunction.

Description: Making the false assumption that when presented with an either/or possibility, that if one of the options is true that the other one must be false.  This is when the “or” is not explicitly defined as being exclusive.

This fallacy is similar to the unwarranted contrast fallacy.

Logical Form:

P or Q.


Therefore, not Q.


P or Q.


Therefore, not P.

Example #1:

I can’t stop eating these chocolates.  I really love chocolate, or I seriously lack willpower.  I know I really love chocolate; therefore, I cannot lack willpower.

Explanation: Ignoring the possible false dilemma, the fact that one really loves chocolate does not automatically exclude the other possibility of lacking willpower.

Example #2:

I am going to bed or watching TV.  I am exhausted, so I will go to bed; therefore, I cannot watch TV.

Explanation: It is logically and physically possible to go to bed and watch TV at the same time, I know that for a fact as I do it just about every night.  The “or” does not logically exclude the option that is not chosen.

Exception: If the choices are mutually exclusive (either by necessity or indicated by the word "either"), then it can be deduced that the other choice must be false.  Again, we are working under the assumption that one of the choices we are given represents the truth.

Today is either Monday or Sunday.  It is Monday.  Therefore, it is not Sunday.

In formal logic, the above is referred to as a valid disjunctive syllogism.


Kilgore, W. J. (1979). An introductory logic. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Registered User Comments

Wolfgang P
Monday, March 13, 2017 - 06:08:21 PM
I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with this one. The English Dictionary on "either or" states: "used to refer to a situation in which there is a choice between two different plans of action, but both together are not possible"

Either/or is the logical "exclusive or" (XOR), so the argument is valid - or in other words your 'exception' is always true. If you drop the 'either', you are right. However, I agree that a lot of people use "either/or" instead of "or" when the options are not mutually exclusive.

login to reply
1 reply
0 votes


Bo Bennett, PhD
Wednesday, March 15, 2017 - 06:05:15 AM
You are correct here. The fallacy is correct, but the use of "either/or" in the example is not correct. I will fix.

login to reply
0 votes


 Copyright 2017, Archieboy Holdings, LLC.