Quickly register to comment, Ask questions, and/or keep up to date on new fallacies.

one moment please...

Reductio ad Hitlerum

  Get the Book!

Get the book, Logically Fallacious by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:

Get It!

reductio ad hitlerum

(also known as: argumentum ad Hitlerum, playing the Nazi card, Hitler Card)

Description: The attempt to make an argument analogous with Hitler or the Nazi party.  Hitler is probably the most universally despised figure in history, so any connection to Hitler, or his beliefs, can (erroneously) cause others to view the argument in a similar light.  However, this fallacy is becoming more well known as is the fact that it is most often a desperate attempt to render the truth claim of the argument invalid out of lack of a good counter argument.

Logical Forms:

Person 1 suggests that Y is true.

Hitler liked Y.

Therefore, Y is false.


Person 1 suggests that Y is true.

Person 1’s rhetoric sounds a bit like Hitler’s.

Therefore, Y is false.

Example #1:

Peter Gibbons: It's NOT wrong. INITECH is wrong. INITECH is an evil corporation, all right? Chochkies is wrong. Doesn't it bother you that you have to get up in the morning and you have to put on a bunch of pieces of flair?

Joanna: Yeah, but I'm not about to go in and start taking money from the register.

Peter Gibbons: Well, maybe you should. You know, the Nazis had pieces of flair that they made the Jews wear.

Joanna: What?

Explanation: The above was from the classic masterpiece film, Office Space.  Out of desperation, Peter plays the "Nazi card" in order to make the idea of being made to wear flair more appalling.  This somewhat jarring statement misdirects the argument, and the focus is taken off Joanna’s last response, which was quite good.

Example #2:

The God of the Old Testament was big into religious cleansing.  Hitler was big into ethnic cleansing.  Therefore, God is like Hitler.

Explanation: It wouldn't even matter if God had a swastika tattooed to his forehead.  The moment one compares anyone to Hitler, they have shown that they are desperate.

Exception: Sometimes it might be worth risking the fallacy to prevent disaster.

Mr. President, I can appreciate your desire to make some changes in the White House, but that new hand gesture you are proposing we use to show our allegiance to you is way too much like the one Hitler used.  On a similar note, that Charlie Chaplin mustache doesn’t work on you.


Strauss, L. (1953). Natural Right and History. University of Chicago Press.

Registered User Comments

Joe Walker
Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 03:27:35 PM
Using Hitler to show subjective moral values is using this fallacy (?) - example, the Nuremberg trials invoked objective moral values in order to prosecute his staff because if they were only following orders from their individual state (Germany) - (if only subjective moral values exist) then they should not be held accountable (that was their argument), of course we used objective moral values to prove their guilt and won. Or could this be an exception.

login to reply
1 reply
0 votes


Bo Bennett, PhD
Saturday, January 21, 2017 - 03:36:32 PM
This would only show that Hitler was a less valid source of morality than another source. No objectivity needed in this case.

login to reply
0 votes


 Copyright 2017, Archieboy Holdings, LLC.