search

Willed Ignorance

Description: Refusing to change one’s mind or consider conflicting information based on a desire to maintain one's existing beliefs.

Logical Form:

I believe X.

You have evidence for Y.

I don’t want to see it because I don't want to stop believing in X, so X is still true.

Example #1:

I don’t want anything coming in the way of me and my beliefs; therefore, I will only socialize with people who share my beliefs.

Explanation: This is a common form of the fallacy -- excluding oneself from society as a whole to smaller subgroups where the same general opinions are shared.

Example #2:
Carl: Exercise causes cancer.
Janet: That is not true. I have mountains of evidence I can show you that demonstrates the opposite.
Carl: You keep your exercise propaganda to yourself. I know what I know. Now if you will excuse me, I have to binge watch Baywatch.
Explanation: Carl is blissfully ignorant in his belief that allows him to avoid the wonderful pain of exercise. Perhaps Carl does suspect that he is wrong, but feels he does not have to change his belief until he is proven wrong. Thus, he will not allow Janet the opportunity to prove him wrong.
Exception: There may be circumstances where ignorance is truly bliss, and it is better to maintain a positive illusion than to be exposed to a hard truth that one is not psychologically prepared to accept.
Fun Fact: This fallacy is similar to the confirmation bias, but as a fallacy, it is used in argumentation.

References:

This a logical fallacy frequently used on the Internet. No academic sources could be found.

Questions about this fallacy? Ask our community!

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book