Accused of a fallacy? Suspect a fallacy? Ask Dr. Bo and the community!

Quickly register to comment, ask and respond to questions, and get FREE access to our passive online course on cognitive biases!

one moment please...


When we hear the word “argument,” we tend to think of an adversarial confrontation between two or more people, with bickering, defensiveness, and increased negative emotions.  This is only one kind of argument—not the kind we will be focusing on in this book.  Academically and logically, an argument is an attempt to persuade someone of something by offering reasons to accept a given conclusion. We make and hear arguments every day and often do not recognize them.  We are constantly being bombarded with persuasion and led to conclusions, without being consciously aware. Sometimes the persuasion is very subtle, sometimes the reasons are implied, and sometimes the conclusion is assumed. For the purpose of this book, we just need to be able to recognize arguments when we hear them or make them.

An argument is made up of premises and a conclusion. The premises can also be referred to as reasons, supporting evidence, or claims.

Premise 1 (P1). Pizza is the best-selling food in America.
Premise 2 (P2). We can reasonably assume that "best-selling" means that people like it.
Conclusion (C). People in America like pizza.

If we just stated that "people in America like pizza," we wouldn't technically be making an argument; we would just be stating a proposition, assertion, claim, or even opinion. We cannot talk about logical fallacies unless they are in the context of an argument. Often, arguments are less formal as in

People in America like pizza. This is obvious because it is the best-selling food in America.

From this structure, we can still spot the premise and conclusion. Thus, we can talk about logical fallacies. Again, if we just asserted the conclusion, logical fallacies are unlikely to apply.

I use the terms "arguer" and "opponent" or "audience" to represent the one making the argument and the person or persons considering the argument, respectively. Keep in mind that the arguer could be a political candidate, Jehovah's Witness, a spouse, the 17-year-old kid at the returns desk in Walmart, or anyone capable of rational communication. The opponent/audience could be a police officer, your best friend, your spouse, or anyone else capable of rational communication.

Deduction is a form of reasoning and argument in which the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises. Sticking with the classic example:

Premise 1: All humans are mortal.
Premise 2: Socrates is a human.
Conclusion: Socrates is mortal.

If the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. That is what makes an argument deductive. This is also referred to as a formal argument.

Arguments where the conclusion is merely based on probability, not necessity, are considered inductive arguments.  These are usually constructed through inductive reasoning, which is the process of making general conclusions from specific instances.  For example:

Premise 1: The sun has risen every day so far.
Conclusion: Therefore, the sun will likely rise tomorrow.

Because the sun could explode tonight, the conclusion is just very probable; therefore, this is an inductive or informal argument.

I will be using these terms throughout the book.  If you don’t understand them now, you will very soon.

Arguments are everywhere.  You make them every day, and you hear them every day.  Where you find arguments, you find fallacious arguments.  Where you find fallacious arguments, you find fallacious reasoning.

Registered User Comments

Maasiah Robinson
Monday, January 14, 2019 - 10:10:56 AM
Let's say the sun rises everyday therefore it should rise tomorrow. Then cloud darken the sunlight to a point where it looks like nighttime for a month. Someone claims that the sun no longer rises because they no longer see the sunlight. How do prove that argument wrong.

login to reply
1 reply
0 votes
Reply To Comment

Bo Bennett, PhD
Monday, January 14, 2019 - 10:45:39 AM
This would have to be some unknown event beyond clouds because clouds darken the sky but would never fool anyone of even below average intellect that the sun has not "risen." A cloudy day time is quite different from night time. How to prove? Video from other parts of the world where it is not cloudy, satellite photos, the fact that the earth is still here, etc.

login to reply
0 votes
Reply To Comment

Become a Logical Fallacy Master. Choose Your Poison.

Logically Fallacious is one of the most comprehensive collections of logical fallacies with all original examples and easy to understand descriptions; perfect for educators, debaters, or anyone who wants to improve his or her reasoning skills.

Get the book, Logically Fallacious by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:

Not Much of a Reader? No Problem!

Enroll in the Mastering Logical Fallacies Online Course. Over 10 hours of video and interactive learning. Go beyond the book!

Enroll in the Fallacy-A-Day Passive Course. Sit back and learn fallacies the easy way—in just a few minutes per day, via e-mail delivery.

Have a podcast or know someone who does? Putting on a conference? Dr. Bennett is available for interviews and public speaking events. Contact him directly here.

About Archieboy Holdings, LLC. Privacy Policy Other Books Written by Bo
 Website Software Copyright 2019, Archieboy Holdings, LLC.