(also known as: the fallacy of the consequent, converting a conditional)

**Description:** Switching the antecedent and the consequent in a logical argument.

**Logical Form:**

If P then Q.

Therefore, if Q then P.

**Example #1:**

If I have a PhD, then I am smart.

Therefore, if I am smart, then I have a PhD.

**Explanation:** There are many who could, rightly so, disagree with the first premise, but assuming that premise is true, does not guarantee that the conclusion is true. There are many smart people without PhDs.

**Example #2:**

If I have herpes, then I have a strange rash.

Therefore, if I have a strange rash, then I have herpes.

**Explanation:** I am glad this is not true. One can have non-herpes rashes.

**Exception:** If p=q, then it is necessarily true that q=p.

**References:**

Pickard, W. A., & Aristotle. (2006). *On Sophistical Refutations*. ReadHowYouWant.com, Limited.

*Logically Fallacious* is one of the most comprehensive collections of logical fallacies with all original examples and easy to understand descriptions; perfect for educators, debaters, or anyone who wants to improve his or her reasoning skills.

Get the book, *Logically Fallacious* by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:

**Enroll in the Mastering Logical Fallacies Online Course. **Over 10 hours of video and interactive learning. Go beyond the book!

**Enroll in the Fallacy-A-Day Passive Course**. Sit back and learn fallacies the easy way—in just a few minutes per day, via e-mail delivery.

*Have a podcast or know someone who does? Putting on a conference? Dr. Bennett is available for interviews and public speaking events. Contact him directly here.*