|
|
When you need more time to prove even if you have been proven wrong again and again1.When you ask for more time in order to prove your point right dispite of you have been proven wrong again and again.
Sometimes you were always right and you have to wait and be wrong for a while, but sometimes you were always wrong but ask for more time as a justification to mask your error |
| asked on Thursday, Nov 14, 2019 12:04:44 PM by Joaquín García | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
|
Person 1 claims X is true and can prove it
Person 2 says s/he's been given ample opportunity and has failed each time Person 1 responds I can still prove it I just need more time. I don't see the error or deception in logic as Person I may indeed just need more time. It's possible. There could be many reasons for requiring more time. Continuances occur all of the time in both legal and scientific arenas. Quite acceptable. Now, if it's just a stall tactic and Person 1 is deceptively avoiding the inevitability of being wrong. It could be a form of Ad hoc rescue. |
| answered on Thursday, Nov 14, 2019 02:21:05 PM by mchasewalker |
Comments |
|
| |