|
A YouTube Video of a 2006 Talk, Entitled "Global Warming: Fallacies and Substantial Doubt" www.youtube.com/watch?tim. . .
In my first public presentation on my own choice of topics since my Ph.D. defense, I focused on elements of IPCC arguments for AGW, finding multiple fallacies. The presentation was before an audience of about 50, at Bergen Community College, in a public room. Since "Logically Fallacious" was created to examine fallacies, I thought the title of my presentation made it an apt topic for member consideration. |
asked on Sunday, Jun 02, 2019 10:17:22 AM by DrBill | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.
This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book.
|
It's not a long video. The idea of fallacies of IPCC is presented in it. Perhaps it could be watched.
|
answered on Tuesday, Jun 04, 2019 10:57:47 AM by DrBill |
Comments |
|