|
|
What logical fallacies are being used in this situation?This seems to be a common occurrence now with the upcoming elections . It goes like this:
1. None of my friends and family support candidate X, so " no one " supports X. Which then leads to: 2. Because "no one" supports Candidate X, if they win, it was because the election was rigged. I think there's multiple logical fallacies involved but I'm not sure what they are. And it's unfortunate that so many people do this line of thinking when it comes to politics. |
| asked on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 12:48:12 AM by | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
None of my friends and family support candidate X, so "no one" supports X. That would be a hasty generalization fallacy as the person takes a very limited sample (their friends and family) and fallacious asserts that nobody supports the candidate based on the fact that their family and friends don't support that candidate. As for the second argument where they conclude that if the candidate wins the election was rigged, this is not a fallacious argument but rather an argument that contains a factual error (the error being that nobody supports the candidate). |
| answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 01:21:01 AM by Abdulazeez |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
I would just add that this can also be a biased sample fallacy, using only family and friends if one's family and friends have the same political leanings. Otherwise, hasty generalization fallacy fits nicely as well.
|
| answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 06:49:00 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
Yep. Basically hasty generalization, combined with a good bit of good old-fashioned narrow-mindedness.
|
| answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 11:19:17 AM by Bill |
Comments |
|
| |