Question

...

What logical fallacies are being used in this situation?

This seems to be a common occurrence now with the upcoming elections . It goes like this:

1. None of my friends and family support candidate X, so " no one " supports X.

Which then leads to:
2. Because "no one" supports Candidate X, if they win, it was because the election was rigged.

I think there's multiple logical fallacies involved but I'm not sure what they are. And it's unfortunate that so many people do this line of thinking when it comes to politics.
asked on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 12:48:12 AM by

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Reason: Books I & II

This book is based on the first five years of The Dr. Bo Show, where Bo takes a critical thinking-, reason-, and science-based approach to issues that matter with the goal of educating and entertaining. Every chapter in the book explores a different aspect of reason by using a real-world issue or example.

Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Abdulazeez
0

None of my friends and family support candidate X, so "no one" supports X.


That would be a hasty generalization fallacy as the person takes a very limited sample (their friends and family) and fallacious asserts that nobody supports the candidate based on the fact that their family and friends don't support that candidate.
As for the second argument where they conclude that if the candidate wins the election was rigged, this is not a fallacious argument but rather an argument that contains a factual error (the error being that nobody supports the candidate).
answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 01:21:01 AM by Abdulazeez

Comments

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
I would just add that this can also be a biased sample fallacy, using only family and friends if one's family and friends have the same political leanings. Otherwise, hasty generalization fallacy fits nicely as well.
answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 06:49:00 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Bill
0
Yep. Basically hasty generalization, combined with a good bit of good old-fashioned narrow-mindedness.
answered on Saturday, Aug 31, 2019 11:19:17 AM by Bill

Comments