What kind of fallacy is it when someone states that because person A has not done everything in his or her power for social cause X, then social cause X is not a worthy cause?

Question

Bo Bennett, PhD	What kind of fallacy is it when someone states that because person A has not done everything in his or her power for social cause X, then social cause X is not a worthy cause? ###posting as anonymous###
	asked on Monday, May 01, 2017 04:11:47 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD
Top Categories Suggested by Community
Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

Bo Bennett, PhD 0	The main error here is the ad hominem tu quoque . The behavior of the person supporting the social cause is not an determinate of the cause's social worth. If a person was protesting a meat factory, and they were NOT a vegetarian, then they might be a hypocrite, but that does not mean that reducing animal slaughter is not a worthwhile cause. In this example, an analogy might be the best way to demonstrate the error in the reasoning: So if we don't sell all of possessions and give the money to the starving children, does that mean that helping starving children is not a worthy cause? If we change the issue, it might be more clear to the arguer since they most likely are emotionally invested in the issue about which they made the fallacy.
	answered on Monday, May 01, 2017 04:11:47 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD
Comments