You can't separate the influence of the Church from the state. If you do so, you are rejecting on no other basis than 'It's religious therefore no'.
Just a vacuous claim. How exactly is it asserted that if you seperate the influence of the Church from the state you are only doing it because 'It's religious therefore no'? Many reasons are usually given for trying to seperate the Church from the state that don't simply boil down to 'religious so no'. It's much more than that.
But you can't do that because that would be discrimination based on religion, which is illegal.
Again, this claim is built on the assertion that separating Church from the state is simply because 'religious therefore no', which is a baseless assertion. So anything built on it is baseless too.
You can't discount religious words because they're just as valid as any other sort of opinion or ideological ground.
False assertion. No, not all opinions and ideologies are created equal, and opinions/ideologies that are proven to not work or not help nations thrive are legitimate to be discarded as such for better opinions/ideologies to be adopted.
In this case, the only logical thing to do, is to actively include religion in government processes, because the system by which the government works, including Church separation, forbids you from making religious thought void.
Just because the government prevents you from making any sort of thought void, it doesn't follow that this thought should be actively included in government processes. Non-sequitur. Plus, which religious thought exactly are you forbidden from making void? does that include the Muslim religious thought? If so, should you also actively include sharia law in government processes?
Since religion is a big part of any nation, also to respect the citizens, religion should be part of government.
Again, should sharia law be part of government in a nation where Islam is a big part of that nation? Would it be respectful to the citizens to adpot laws that include throwing gay people off rooftops? Doesn't sound like respect to me (at least not to the gays hitting the floor after being thrown).
It is objectively true that as it presents itself, Separation of Church and State is counter to the interests and rights of the citizens.
Another baseless claim. How is it objectively true?