|
|
Is this a fallacy?So, I watched a video where a Youtuber (Let's call him Guy A) pointed out another Youtuber's (Let's call him Guy B) hypocrisy by saying that while Guy B claims to support rape survivors, he has made rape jokes in the past. (Cut to a segment of a stream where Guy B jokes about and downplays rape)
After Guy A's video was released, Guy B made a response video saying that because he made those jokes in the past, he can't be criticized for it. I have a feeling this is a Fallacy, but I don't know which one. Did Guy B use a fallacy in his response, and if so which one? |
| asked on Saturday, Mar 03, 2018 12:37:12 PM by Connor | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
You can use a reductio ad absurdum to show that this is absurd, since every statement ever made was in the past (i.e., therefore, there is no one could ever be criticized for anything they ever say).
If Guy B has apologized for the statement, then he could remind Guy A of that fact, but he is still responsible for saying it. It would be up to Guy A to accept the apology and/or determine the sincerity of the apology. |
| answered on Saturday, Mar 03, 2018 02:30:12 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD |
Comments |
|
| |