Question

...
Metaphysical Materialism1248

How do I repond to claims that you don't understand?

Because it is hard to refute arguments properly when I do not understand it.

There are three ways this can happen.
1. You don't understand the concepts in the argument
2. Your opponent failed to use clear language
3. Your opponent deliberately do it.

In a online debate, I had this argument
My Opponent: No half evolved animals have ever been found and never will be. If scientists couldn't find any in the last 140 years, how will we find any in the future. We are a lot more advanced than we were over one hundred years ago. With all this technology we still can't find any evidence. (this is a Appeal to ignorance)
Me: By saying their is half-evolved animals, you are implying there is fully animals (Which is false since evolution is an continuous process).
My Opponent: There can be half-evolved animals even though it supposedly never stops. Time never stops but we still can measure it. With time we get one number and another number after that and we can measure the time within those two numbers. Why can't scientist get a monkey and a human and find the half-evolved animals? Scientist can do that with any animal.

I did not understand my Opponents rebuttal to my rebuttal.

The rest of the debate if you want to read it (in hindsight there are many things that I could done better)
http://www.debate.org/debates/Evolution-is-Defensible./2/
asked on Wednesday, Sep 23, 2015 01:50:55 AM by Metaphysical Materialism1248

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Master the "Rules of Reason" for Making and Evaluating Claims

Claims are constantly being made, many of which are confusing, ambiguous, too general to be of value, exaggerated, unfalsifiable, and suggest a dichotomy when no such dichotomy exists. Good critical thinking requires a thorough understanding of the claim before attempting to determine its veracity. Good communication requires the ability to make clear, precise, explicit claims, or “strong” claims. The rules of reason in this book provide the framework for obtaining this understanding and ability.

This book / online course is about the the eleven rules of reason for making and evaluating claims. Each covered in detail in the book

Take the Online Course

Answers

...
Sergiu
0
"No half evolved animals have ever been found and never will be" and "There can be half-evolved animals even though it supposedly never stops. " seem to contradict each other. You can simply point out this blatant contradiction to your opponent.

You should ask for further information or clarification if you don't understand a word or claim. When it comes to ambiguous words, make clear to your opponent that you want to grasp the intended meaning of his terms. Many times, it is useful to restate the claim or argument so that your opponent confirms you have a good understand of what he/she is claiming or arguing.
answered on Wednesday, Sep 23, 2015 07:23:32 AM by Sergiu

Comments

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0

It's tough with asynchronous online debates because of the delay that makes asking for clarification a real hassle—especially with someone who is consistently unclear. I have generally two strategies:

1) Ask for clarification. If you have the time and patience, this is generally the preferable way to go. Example: "What do you mean by 'half-evolved'?" But be forewarned that this often results in the failure to elucidate.

2) Use the "if by" technique. Think about what they could possibly mean and respond to that, but be clear that you are speculating and also ask for clarification to avoid strawmanning. For example: "If by 'half-evolved' you mean a transitional fossil, then we have found countless numbers of them. For a quick education, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils. If you mean something different, please clarify."

answered on Wednesday, Sep 23, 2015 07:49:14 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments

...
Joni
0
Don't respond, listen.
answered on Thursday, Oct 01, 2015 05:50:35 AM by Joni

Comments