Question

...
Joe M.

I recently heard an argument somewhere about why do many Africans Americans believe in Christianity even though it was imposed on them by slave owners years ago. Is this an example of the genetic fallacy?

I am curious if it is fallacious to argue something along the lines of:
"slave owners imposed Christianity on African Americans many years ago, therefore that religion is wrong"
or "slave owners imposed Christianity on African Americans many years ago, therefore African Americans should not believe it."

Even though I cannot deny these atrocities that happened in the past, I have a feeling this might be an example of the genetic fallacy, but I am not entirely sure.

Thanks for the help.
asked on Friday, Feb 06, 2015 12:42:09 AM by Joe M.

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Eat Meat... Or Don't.

Roughly 95% of Americans don’t appear to have an ethical problem with animals being killed for food, yet all of us would have a serious problem with humans being killed for food. What does an animal lack that a human has that justifies killing the animal for food but not the human?

As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.

In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0

Some slave owners also imposed education on slaves, so should they reject education because of that? That is just an example of a analogy that can be used to see that the original statement is probably fallacious, although it does not tell you why.

When someone makes a statement such as the one in your example, there is usually an implied (or implicit) claim being made as well. Before we scream "fallacy," it is usually a good idea to rephrase the statement and make the implicit claim explicit. For example, "Are you suggesting that the truth of Christianity is somehow affected by the fact that slave owners imposed the beliefs on slaves?" Of course, that is a fallacious claim and would most likely be countered by something such as, "No, but it does explain, in part at least, why so many African Americans believe in Christianity today, especially in the South," which would be a reasonable claim.

I would agree with you in that the argument, "slave owners imposed Christianity on African Americans many years ago, therefore African Americans should not believe it" might best be characterized as committing the Genetic Fallacy .
answered on Friday, Feb 06, 2015 10:25:00 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories

Comments