|
|
What kind of fallacy is this?A debater makes an assertion and then list 3 cases A, B, C as resulting from his assertion. A is absurd and obviously false, B is a half-truth, C is mostly correct. He argues that since C is correct therefore his assertion is correct. I know in this case, his argument is incorrect and he is committing a fallacy. But what kind of fallacy is this? It is not exactly comparing apples to oranges (I tried to search using the words but came up with nothing).
|
| asked on Saturday, Nov 22, 2014 02:42:32 PM by shuami | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
It sounds as if it might be a form of the False Dilemma (trilemma). This sounds sort of like the Jesus was either a lunatic, liar, or Lord. Limiting choices is fallacious and shows a lack of creative thinking. Reality is generally far more complex and less black and white, and other options can exist (e.g., it is possible that Jesus was legend ). Not sure what else I can suggest based on your description. Perhaps if you provide a real example it will help. Thanks! |
| answered on Monday, Dec 22, 2014 06:39:07 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
