Question

...
Sing

What kind of fallacy is committed when people keep ignoring refutation of their premises?

Suppose Smith uses P as a premise. He keeps using it even after it is criticized and refuted. What fallacy does he commit?
asked on Sunday, Oct 08, 2017 02:34:32 AM by Sing

Top Categories Suggested by Community

Comments

Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."

Uncomfortable Ideas: Facts don't care about feelings. Science isn't concerned about sensibilities. And reality couldn't care less about rage.

This is a book about uncomfortable ideas—the reasons we avoid them, the reasons we shouldn’t, and discussion of dozens of examples that might infuriate you, offend you, or at least make you uncomfortable.

Many of our ideas about the world are based more on feelings than facts, sensibilities than science, and rage than reality. We gravitate toward ideas that make us feel comfortable in areas such as religion, politics, philosophy, social justice, love and sex, humanity, and morality. We avoid ideas that make us feel uncomfortable. This avoidance is a largely unconscious process that affects our judgment and gets in the way of our ability to reach rational and reasonable conclusions. By understanding how our mind works in this area, we can start embracing uncomfortable ideas and be better informed, be more understanding of others, and make better decisions in all areas of life.

Get 20% off this book and all Bo's books*. Use the promotion code: websiteusers

* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.

Get the Book

Answers

...
Bo Bennett, PhD
0
This kind of behavior is generally seen as a cognitive bias or even a departure from the reasoning process (rather than an error within reasoning). A clear refutation deserves acknowledgement or at least a counter refutation (a refutation of the refutation). A strong confirmation bias might lead to the person overlooking the obvious refutation to protect him or her from being wrong. Or, the person might be aware of the strong refutation, and simply ignore it because they are more interested in the perception of being right than in the truth. This essentially breaks the rules of argumentation and honest dialectic with a basis in reason.
answered on Sunday, Oct 08, 2017 06:31:15 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD

Comments

...
Your Supreme Excellency
0
Willful Ignorance. When that occurs, you can't reason w/ people like them. And you've got to move on.
answered on Monday, Oct 09, 2017 11:32:09 AM by Your Supreme Excellency

Comments