|
|
What fallacy is this?What kind of fallacy is this?
Person 1 claims that paper straws are better for the environment as opposed to plastic ones. Person 2 claims like the 6 plastic solo cups or the styrofoam to-go box is okay... but we are “going green” with paper straws. It’s a joke |
| asked on Wednesday, Jan 08, 2020 08:29:02 PM by Jason Mathias | |
Top Categories Suggested by Community |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
|
Not a fallacy at all. Just b/c you can't solve the whole problem doesn't mean you shouldn't solve part of it.
|
| answered on Wednesday, Jan 08, 2020 08:32:24 PM by Bill |
Comments |
|
| |
|
|
He's basically attacking his "morality" instead of his argument. A variation of Ad Fidentia |
| answered on Tuesday, Mar 03, 2020 11:43:21 PM by Aryan | |
Aryan Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
| |
