Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Get all EIGHT of Bo's printed books, all autographed*. Save over $50!
* This offer is for residents of United States and Canada only.
|
I would argue that, on first glance, it appears to be, and it falls under Relative Privation . The fallacy is in the comparison of an unfair worst-case scenario (third-world country poverty) to our case (poverty in the US). You are clearly stating that poverty is a problem, and your friend appears to be minimizing the importance of that problem by comparing it to something extreme. Your friend's comparison does not negate your claim that poverty is a real issue (implied importance). |
answered on Tuesday, Oct 14, 2014 06:00:34 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | |
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|