Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
As you start to list properties that the animal lacks to justify eating them, you begin to realize that some humans also lack those properties, yet we don’t eat those humans. Is this logical proof that killing and eating animals for food is immoral? Don’t put away your steak knife just yet.
In Eat Meat… Or Don’t, we examine the moral arguments for and against eating meat with both philosophical and scientific rigor. This book is not about pushing some ideological agenda; it’s ultimately a book about critical thinking.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
I see three arguments here: Lincoln was a Republican and the founders of the KKK were democrats. Therefore, Democrats are the party of racism, Republicans are the party of freeing slaves and civil rights. This is a form of the etymological fallacy based on how we are defining "Democrats" and "Republicans." I say "form" because it isn't the definition that changed per se, but what the party stands for. In a broader sense, we are going from a "was" to an "is." At the least, this conclusion is a non sequitur . The Democrats are the party of racism, Republicans are the party of freeing slaves and civil rights. Therefore, the democrats of today are the racists and the republicans of today are actually not racist like the racist lying democrats want you to believe for nefarious reasons. This is just a rephrasing of the first argument, with some poisoning the well thrown in. The democrats of today are the racists and the republicans of today are actually not racist like the racist lying democrats want you to believe for nefarious reasons. Therefore, Trump is not racist, but Biden is a racist. This argument takes on the problems with the first two arguments, then adds in the fallacy of division . Trump is a member of the set "Republicans." As a group, (so the claim goes), the Republicans are not the group of racists, therefore, Trump isn't. This conclusion is fallacious. |
|||||||
answered on Saturday, Sep 05, 2020 07:46:01 AM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||||||
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
||||||||
Comments |
||||||||
|
|
Chronological Snobbery. As you've correctly pointed out the claim relies upon an earlier platform of the GOP and Dixiecrats rather than the current present-day realities of both parties. |
answered on Saturday, Sep 05, 2020 01:07:10 PM by mchasewalker | |
mchasewalker Suggested These Categories |
|
Comments |
|
|
|
I don't see a question here. |
|||||||
answered on Tuesday, Sep 08, 2020 07:16:04 AM by DrBill | ||||||||
DrBill Suggested These Categories |
||||||||
Comments |
||||||||
|