Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
The Confirmation Bias is what you are describing. This is when we believe information/claims inline with our ideology and narratives, and reject claims that go against. It wouldn't be a fallacy. |
|||
answered on Sunday, Jan 09, 2022 03:22:01 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|
|
Dr Bo is correct. It is easier, psychologically, to accept evidence that supports our beliefs. This is not a flaw in the logic of an argument, but a systemic flaw in reasoning. Thus, it's a cognitive bias, not a fallacy. However, it often leads to biased ways of thinking that result in fallacies when attempting to justify one's position using argument. For instance, cherry picking. |
|||
answered on Sunday, Jan 09, 2022 08:26:26 PM by TrappedPrior (RotE) | ||||
TrappedPrior (RotE) Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|