Want to get notified of all questions as they are asked? Update your mail preferences and turn on "Instant Notification."
Part one is about how science works even when the public thinks it doesn't. Part two will certainly ruffle some feathers by offering a reason- and science-based perspective on issues where political correctness has gone awry. Part three provides some data-driven advice for your health and well-being. Part four looks at human behavior and how we can better navigate our social worlds. In part five we put on our skeptical goggles and critically examine a few commonly-held beliefs. In the final section, we look at a few ways how we all can make the world a better place.
* This is for the author's bookstore only. Applies to autographed hardcover, audiobook, and ebook.
|
This sounds like Double Bind. Not really a fallacy. |
|||||||
answered on Tuesday, May 03, 2022 01:15:11 PM by Bo Bennett, PhD | ||||||||
Bo Bennett, PhD Suggested These Categories |
||||||||
Comments |
||||||||
|
|
I don't see a logical fallacy at all, except perhaps cherry picking by choosing alternate reasons for supporting opposing positions. I'm not sure Mom's logic is bad – it seems that she's more inclined to find fault than be supportive. (I suspect Mom isn't the only one highly skilled in seeing the down side of things.) Mom correctly identifies at least one risk associated with each option and then stops short of actually assessing and comparing those risks (catching COVID from being out in public vs. being unhealthy from lacking fresh air). She does have a point in each situation; however, just because there's some degree of risk associated with a particular option doesn't mean that risk is too great to accept. I might be able to criticize Mom for a number of things ... just not for bad logic. |
|||
answered on Wednesday, May 04, 2022 10:18:25 AM by Arlo | ||||
Arlo Suggested These Categories |
||||
Comments |
||||
|