← Back to archive

Appeal to possibility definition

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Original Question

I'm reading the definition of appeal to possibility where it says 
"When a conclusion is assumed not because it is probably true or it has not been demonstrated to be impossible, but because it is possible that it is true"
Isn't it "not being impossible" the same as "being possible"?

Why not:
"When a conclusion is assumed not because it is probably true or it has not been demonstrated to be impossible, but because it is possible that it is true, no matter how improbable"

Answers

1

You might be working with an older version of the book. The website reads: appeal to possibility :  
When a conclusion is assumed not because it is probably true, but because it is possible that it is true, no matter how improbable.

Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Master Logical Fallacies Online

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course