Accused of a fallacy? Suspect a fallacy? Ask Dr. Bo and the community!

Quickly register to comment, ask and respond to questions, and get FREE access to our passive online course on cognitive biases!
Register!

one moment please...


Blog Home Tags:
ambiguity
emotion
Print

Welcome to the Upside Down

posted Tuesday Jul 18, 2017 07:04 AM

image loading...

Bo Bennett, PhD


About Bo Bennett, PhD

Sorry, this user has not created a bio yet.

I remember a bit from one of my favorite comedians, Eddie Murphy, in his video titled Raw. Without getting nearly as graphic as Eddie or being nearly as funny, I will paraphrase the joke: he talks about how a woman gets to be so enamored with a man that she can catch him in bed with another woman "butt-naked," then storm out of the room. When she confronts the man the next day, he would simply deny it. Then after a few back-and-forths, the woman would say "maybe it wasn't you." Although written as comedy, there is a lot of truth in this bit, specifically, the idea that our passions, desires, and biases (i.e., emotions) can be so powerful that it can make us believe that what is clearly true to others, is clearly false to us. Perhaps this problem is worse now than in the past because political partisanship is at an all time high, and many things have become politicized including religion, climate change, and social issues. To use a term from the Netflix series, Stranger Things, it seems like we are living in the "upside down."

Here is the formula to turn any fact upside down:

Emotion + Ambiguity = The Upside Down

This is the exact strategy that flat earthers use to convice people the earth is flat, creationists use to convince people that the world is only about 6000 years old, and climate change deniers use to convince people that 97% of the world's climatologists are wrong (and Alex Jones and other political commentators are right). Let's look at a couple of recent examples and then see how we can use this same formula to deny just about any fact.

Let's start with the new narrative that "everyone is racist." Racism has historically been understood as having a sense of superiority for one's own race. But there are other definitions of racism, including simply "racial prejudice or discrimination." Generally speaking, the fewer terms, the greater the possibility for ambiguity. Now sprinkle in the desire for racism to be more prevalent (the bigger the problem, the more attention it will get), and the idea that everyone is racist because we all have inherent preferences to people who are like us, becomes a fact. Yes, in the upside down, both you and the leader of the KKK are racists. Deal with it.

How did Donald Trump become the new icon for Christians? Emotion + Ambiguity. No matter what you think of Trump's politics, or how good he might be for Christian causes, any reasonable person not blinded by emotion should see that he is far from a Jesus like figure (at least how Jesus is commonly understood within mainstream Christianity). But if the desire is there to make Trump the ideal Christian leader, the ambiguity is certainly there in the theology. The common claim is that God often uses flawed people to carry out his will. So in the upside down, the ideal Christian leader can also be the worst Christian.

Now let's say that we are horrified by a new trend of slapping old ladies in the face. Assault isn't a big enough word for this... we want to call it murder. How do we do this? Murder requires the wrongful killing of another human being. But what does it mean to be human? What does it mean to die? By slapping an old lady, you are killing her human spirit, therefore, it is murder. Go ahead, laugh at the absurdity. We are all (most likely) thinking clearly about this example because we are not blinded by emotion and driven to unreasoning by passion. We are not motivated to dig deep and stretch the ambiguous parts of the definition to satisfy an emotional itch. Slapping and old lady, as wrong as it may be, is not murder. We are in the right side up.

Next time you are engaged in an argument, ask yourself if you are creating the upside down. Is this an emotional issue for you? Are you exploiting the ambiguity of a definition to fit your needs? You just might be.

 


Podcast Episode: Welcome to the Upside Down


Private, Anonymous Comment On This Post (no login required)Your comment below will be anonymously sent to the post owner, it will not be posted, and you will not get a response. To make a public comment, post below (login required).

Send Comment sending comment...

Registered User Comments

Emiel
Wednesday, April 10, 2019 - 03:35:31 PM
Isn't this the ambiguity fallacy and the definist fallacy? Making something vague of redefining terms in such a way that it supports your preconceived notions?

login to reply
0 replies
0 votes
 
Reply To Comment
working...

Jacob
Sunday, February 18, 2018 - 12:11:51 AM
I feel that this is happening with the definition of "rape" in the post #Metoo world. In the courtroom there is a clear definition of rape, but on facebook there is more ambiguity and emotions run high. There is ambiguity over the definition of rape, therefore everything is rape.

login to reply
1 reply
1 votes
 
Reply To Comment
working...
 

Bo Bennett, PhD
Sunday, February 18, 2018 - 06:49:39 AM
I got unfriended and blocked from a Facebook friend when I suggested that removing a condom during consensual (including marital) sex is a horrible example of rape. I wrote an article about this: https://www.thedrboshow.com/tools/bg/Bo/TheDrBoShow/TeZIXxCP/Virtual-Signaling--Reaction-Formation--Stealthing--and-Reasoning

login to reply
 
0 votes
 
Reply To Comment
working...

Bean Sprugget
Friday, November 10, 2017 - 11:43:53 AM
Great work. I think it would be interesting if you linked the relevant fallacies in the post. It would remove excessive wording while providing more depth and explanation. Or maybe I'm just lazy.

login to reply
0 replies
0 votes
 
Reply To Comment
working...


Become a Logical Fallacy Master. Choose Your Poison.

Logically Fallacious is one of the most comprehensive collections of logical fallacies with all original examples and easy to understand descriptions; perfect for educators, debaters, or anyone who wants to improve his or her reasoning skills.

Get the book, Logically Fallacious by Bo Bennett, PhD by selecting one of the following options:


Not Much of a Reader? No Problem!

Enroll in the Mastering Logical Fallacies Online Course. Over 10 hours of video and interactive learning. Go beyond the book!

Enroll in the Fallacy-A-Day Passive Course. Sit back and learn fallacies the easy way—in just a few minutes per day, via e-mail delivery.

Have a podcast or know someone who does? Putting on a conference? Dr. Bennett is available for interviews and public speaking events. Contact him directly here.


About Archieboy Holdings, LLC. Privacy Policy Other Books Written by Bo
 Website Software Copyright 2019, Archieboy Holdings, LLC. 

Component Viewer

A component is the HTML code for a section of a webpage that can be combined with other components to make a complete webpage. Click the component to insert the component code at the bottom of your current page, then customize it.