← Back to archive

A Genetic Fallacy?

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Original Question

Let's say I'm discussing a very well known test of gravity such as the Cavendish Experiment.  It is very well understood, is performed by physics students in lab classes every semester, and has scientific consensus.


The rebuttal is something like: 


"if you didn't perform it yourself then you can't say the results are accurate or even real"


It is a genetic fallacy to say you weren't there so you can't know?

Answers

1

I would say that it is a false statement more than anything. This claim assumes that the average person is better at conducting a scientific experiment and interpreting data than people who do this for a living, which is not the case.


As for the genetic fallacy , I do think one can make a good argument that this also applies.

Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Master Logical Fallacies Online

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course