Abortion as self-defense
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
Original Question
In some abortion debates it is argued that abortion constitutes a case of self-defense, meaning that the woman did not consent to the Fetus's use of her body and the fetus is an invader, who violated the woman's bodily autonomy. She has the right to use all the necessary force to stop this violation, even if it means the death of the intruder/abuser.
Even if she consented to sex, she did not consent to pregnancy, and the fetus is living in her body and using her organs without her consent.
Even if she consented to sex, she did not consent to pregnancy, and the fetus is living in her body and using her organs without her consent.
Answers
2So, what’s the question? It sounds like a rational legal issue, but certainly not one of logic until there’s question or argument. I understand the apologia and I find it compelling. There’s no deception, no error in reasoning, but a unique and impressive defense.
Even if she consented to sex, she did not consent to pregnancy, and the fetus is living in her body and using her organs without her consent.
This isn't an argument from ignorance fallacy?
We teach sexual education and basic biology in our schools. Everyone should know how babies are made by the time they are in high school.
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course