← Back to archive

Avoiding The Issue vs Red Herring

Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.

Original Question

Could someone clarify the difference between red herring and avoiding the issue ?


What would be an example of each fallacy that isn't the other?  


The entry on the website for  red herring  says:



"While it is similar to the avoiding the issue fallacy, the red herring is a deliberate diversion of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the original argument."



Isn't that true of avoiding the issue too?

Comments on Question

It's another one of those cases where fallacies overlap, but I see what Dr Bo was getting at:



  • red herring is more like a deliberate diversion of the argument

  • avoiding the issue is more or less 'giving up', and not addressing the argument at all in one's response.

Answers

1

A red herring is a deliberate attempt to redirect the argument. It's a form of misdirection, where the 'misdirector' attempts to get their interlocutor to abandon the original point.


E.g.


Kid: "Mum, why do you leave the house at 10 every night, and only come back really late?"


Mother: *growl* "How do you know what time it was, huh? Why weren't you sleeping?"


The mother has changed the issue.


avoiding the issue is a non sequitur but within the context of a conversation. The 'misdirector' makes a statement unrelated to anything previously discussed. Unlike the red herring, it just avoids the argument.


E.g.


Kid: "Mum, why do you leave the house at 10 every night, and only come back really late?"


Mother: *sigh* "You talk too much, Billy."


The mother is avoiding the issue.

Book

Want the full book?

Get the complete guide to logical fallacies by Bo Bennett.

Buy the Book

Master Logical Fallacies Online

Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.

View Online Course