fallacy detection please
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
Original Question
Saturn has a stormy atmospheric hexagonal ring which can be made to look like a cube. Kaba in Mecca is a cube. Therefore kaba is the same as hexagonal ring. Is this a fallacy?
Comments on Question
Answers
1If I am understanding the argument correctly (the wording is a little rough) then, Yes. This is the fallacy of (the) undistributed middle .
All A's (Saturn's stormy atmospheric hexagonal ring) are C's (cube).
All B's (Kaba) are C's (cube).
Therefore, all A’s (Saturn's stormy atmospheric hexagonal ring) are B’s (Kaba).
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course
This is either denial of the antecedent or affirmation of the consequent.
The quality of terms used in the argument need further description - unclear definitions.
The chemistry and physics make this conclusion implausible.