Inflation to Conflict
Historical archive only. New interaction is disabled.
Original Question
I see Inflation to Conflict as what we do with our political parties. We are unconvinced that politicians of either party have the correct answer for issues, and we subsequently we say they're both wrong and respect them less as a consequence. If it's the case I'm right, this seems to be a fairly common fallacy. Would this a be a correct interpretation of the fallacy?
Answers
1A big part of this fallacy is concluding that nothing meaningful can be said about the issue because of the disagreement. Most people who disagree with politicians will still have their own opinion on what should be done.
Master Logical Fallacies Online
Take the Virversity course and sharpen your reasoning skills with structured lessons.
View Online Course